Gamereactor uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best browsing experience on our website. If you continue, we'll assume that you are happy with our cookies policy

Mass Effect: Andromeda

The bulk of Mass Effect: Andromeda was built in 18 months

There were a number of factors causing issues for the development process.

Subscribe to our newsletter here!

* Required field

Mass Effect: Andromeda was under development for quite some time, but was ultimately met with both mediocre reviews and even underperformed on the market compared to its predecessors. Many simply didn't find the spark, the creative spirit that used to dominate the franchise, and there may be a very good reason for that - the main bulk of the game was built in just 18 months.

Kotaku has published a very in-depth report which states that development was bogged down by a director change, several re-scopes, technological challenges, and more, influencing development negatively.

Apparently, the game was partly procedurally-generated up until the end of 2015, when the team realised that proper space exploration didn't work. The project was then re-scoped to include 30 planets, and that number was again reduced to seven.

Ultimately, part of the problem was also that the Frostbite Engine was difficult to use for basic RPG purposes. The game was then rebuilt and reshaped in just 18 months.

Do you think Mass Effect: Andromeda deserves the criticisms it receives?

Mass Effect: Andromeda

Related texts

Mass Effect: AndromedaScore

Mass Effect: Andromeda

REVIEW. Written by Mike Holmes

"There's enough of the series' DNA in there that fans will find this a worthwhile adventure."

Loading next content