Medal of Honor: Warfighter
It's that time of the year when the military shooters come raining in. First up is Medal of Honor: Warfighter.
Military jargon is blasting over the radio. Together with my troop of bearded warriors I have just arrived in the Philippines in order to extract a hostage. The massive city has been flooded and the water tears down buildings and vegetation its path while the roads are now flowing rivers. The thought of this being a modern metropolis up until very recently is mind blowing.
Since we're completely outnumbered we have to be clever about the approach. Silent kills from behind and sniping are preferable, and for a while we managed to remain undetected, but all of a sudden all hell breaks loose. The visuals are amazing, the action overpowering, the sound effects some of the best I've ever experienced, and somehow manages to convey a sense of realism in spite of the grand spectacle on screen. I'm only bothered by one thing - I'm not enjoying this.
I was suspicious of the game even before it arrived at the office as it arrived on the same day as the game was released in America. That's usually a sign that the publisher does not want day one reviews of a game that they know isn't good enough. And when we finally got the game it needed a massive patch before I could get going.
Warning bells were sounding. Something seems to have gone terribly wrong at Danger Close, and an educated guess is that they simply ran out of time, but EA decided to push ahead and get the game out ahead of Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 and Halo 4.
There is nothing in Medal of Honor: Warfighter to contradict my theories, as I manage to die within a few seconds of a training mission. It turns out I went about a task in different manner than the one intended, the price for this was instant death. There was a lesson to be learned there, Medal of Honor: Warfighter isn't a game that encourages creative thinking and expects you to fall in line and follow the trail of breadcrumbs.
It feels surrealistic, and while I curse the antiquated approach, I'm looking at what could quite possibly be the best graphics I've seen on Xbox 360, with the exception of Forza Horizon. Medal of Honor: Warfighter is at times simply stunningly beautiful and it's easy to tell that Danger Close have done a good job with Frostbite 2. The harbour in the training mission comes to life with the dynamic lighting and everything falls apart, explodes and turns to rubble.
You're constantly expected to run along corridors that are a yard wide that have been formed by falling debris until you come upon a helicopter and a conveniently placed rocket launcher that lets you blow it up. Danger Close seems to have ignored everything that made the most recent Medal of Honor an enjoyable experience and instead simply cloned Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3.
And Modern Warfare 3 was criticised for its old and unmodern approach when it was released, so things don't exactly get better a year later when you're trying to do the same things, but can't quite manage to pull it off to the same effect.
Medal of Honor: Warfighter suffers from a case of identity crisis. Is it a hyper realistic action game with attention to detail or a roller coaster ride full of superficial military excess? When I visited Danger Close this spring I noted the passion and creative spark Greg Goodrich carried with him as he wanted to do something new and different in the genre.
He wanted to explore subjects like the strain family life puts on a job where you put your life on the line. He wanted to show how these elite soldiers are put to test trying to keep the world safe, and in order to achieve authenticity several former operatives were involved with the development.
These ambitions are easy to spot in the finished game. The main character is having to deal with a failed relationship and forced to choose whether to spend time with his daughter or help in the war against terrorism. A fresh approach that stands out.
Several of the missions are based on real world events, something that helps create an air of authenticity, and the attention to every little weapons component, and the fact that the screen turns green as you take damage (simulates a damaged gallbladder) are all details that impress. But when the game tells me to just run straight forward and shoot, and basically restricts me from any tactical thinking that whole air of authenticity feels shallow.
To make matters worse we are treated to a shortlist of clichés. There is a level where you're manning a mounted machine gun on the back of a vehicle during a wild chase, there's a pitch-black level where you kill silently using the night vision goggles, there's a level where you shoot people from the air, there's a car chase level, there is a level where you run someone down, and there is a level where you act the sniper and provide cover for your fellow soldiers. There is a complete lack of originality here.
Medal of Honor: Warfighter seldom rises above mediocrity, and it's only towards the end that a few missions appear with story and gameplay co-operating to deliver something that feels fresh and new. It's not enough for a game of this calibre, and add to this the fact that Medal of Honor: Warfighter comes across as unfinished, and you have probably already arrived at the conclusion that it won't score very highly.
During both my playthroughs I was pushed into the line of fire several times by my fellow squad mates whose scripted runs take nothing whatsoever into consideration. And if you happen to die you have to endure replaying large sections of the levels as the checkpoints are poorly distributed and long waits for the loading to conclude.
In places there are invisible walls to ensure I don't try and outmaneuvre the enemy or approach a problem for a different angle. You're meant to plow through the opposition from one direction. And the enemy only has eyes for me. Three of my squad mates can stand right in front of a lone enemy, but he still fires towards my location faraway where he can't even see me. Luckily for him, my fellow Tier 1 operatives are about as accurate as storm troopers with their shots so he needed worry about them.
It's these kind of things that really bugs me as it destroys the illusion of realism completely. The enemy can hit me with a one-handed automatic in complete darkness from 200 yards with only a small crack to aim at. They shouldn't even be able to see me. And as I return fire I'm faced with the next issue as the hit boxes are horrible. Hitting bulls eyes are out of the question and sometimes you're simply forced to abandon any attempts to kill an enemy with the sniper rifle.
Medal of Honor: Warfighter is simply not a finished game and it hurts as there is some potential here. Take a simply thing like the now mandatory breach system that has been given new functionality. You can choose how to breach a door, before engaging the enemy in slow motion. At the start you can only kick the door in, but soon you gain access to an axe, a crow bar, a shotgun and so on.
It's just that it doesn't matter at all. You bash or shoot at the lock before kicking the door open. The standard option is both quicker and more efficient. Why do I have to bother with choosing method? It appears as if Danger Close had plans for something more here, and we're faced with more breach scenes in the first few hours than throughout the entirety of the Call of Duty franchise.
The singleplayer campaign simply doesn't measure up to a passing grade. It's six hours of unpolished, antiquated boredom, and that simply won't do as the first Halo starring Master Chief in five years and the highly anticipated Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 are just around the corner.
And with that it would take an extraordinary multiplayer component to rescue the overall score. And sure, the multiplayer is better than single player, but not nearly good enough to raise the score significantly. One of the problems is the unbelievably cluttered menus and systems for upgrades. Everything takes too long, it's unintuitive and makes you want to quit.
Medal of Honor: Warfighter multiplayer isn't particularly good. There is nothing here to convince anyone to play this over Battlefield 3 or any Call of Duty title, nothing to keep me hooked and entice me into climbing the ranks. Then it matters little that the options for weapons customisation are best in class as it has to be fun to shoot things as well.
As it is it chugs along with great network code, cramped maps, and what appears to be unbalanced weapons. The only thing that really captures my attention is the new co-op mode Fire Team. You're forced to co-operative like never before to stay alive as you're completely dependant on eachother in order to score points and respawn. Your team is never better than its weakest link so you have to have sure that weakest player gets as much support as possible.
But not even Fire Team entertains for any prolonged periods of time and in the time multiplayer isn't enough to save the day. Medal of Honor: Warfighter gets a barely passing grade, as it never really falters completely, but never truly excites. Mediocre and bland. As this is, the game simply isn't good enough to warrant much attention.
- System:PC, PS3, Xbox 360
- Developer:Danger Close Games
- Offline players:1
- Online players:1-8
- Age limit:From 18 years
- Release date:25 October 2012
- Call of Duty: Black Ops Declassified PS Vita
- Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 Multi
- Medal of Honor Multi
- Homefront Multi
- Call of Duty: Black Ops Multi
- Battlefield: Bad Company 2 Multi
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Multi
Me and My Spartan - Halo 3
Behind the Legend: Making of Grimrock 2
Interview: The Behemoth's Dan Paladin
Stalking in the Shadows - Batman: Arkham Asylum